OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign Up / Login or Learn more


Recent comments

(1) View all

I like the main approach of focusing on strengths and resiliency of families. One question I have is how will this program address the specific needs of minority families? I think in some early childhood interventions there is a tendency to approach what "strength" and "resiliency" means through a normative perspective (e.g. primarily White, America, able bodied, etc.). Additionally with the idea that if there are "areas of improvement" these might actually not mean the same thing to minority families. One area of investigation worth examining is how these assessments are working for both minority and non-minority families and as a result, service providers approach in creating goals with families. I see in the Ideation phase of the program it states "First, we will assess existing tools and measures to determine whether or not they fit our understanding of end user needs and goals (as gleaned during the Inspiration phase). With input from home visitors, we will determine whether these assessments ask the right questions and measure the human characteristics we hope to highlight. If they don’t, we will adapt, refine, and develop new tools." I like that there is room here for growth and change; I am left wondering, how? Also, how are families involved with this process? It's important to note that assessments and tools are also created in such a way that it voices the beliefs and values of a select few and that families of minority status may hold differing beliefs and values when it comes to rearing their children, parent attachment styles, and even conceptualizations of resiliency and strength. This is definitely a step in the right direction such that it doesn't focus on the deficits of families or dictate that there is "one-size fits all" approach to empowering parents and I look forward to how this progresses and grows!