OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign up, Login or Learn more

Profile

Recent contributions

(1)

Contribution list

By ~2020, Safe Liquid-Fuel "Nuclear 2.0" reactors will eat existing spent-fuel waste.

We must study the differences between Safe, Liquid-Fuel "Nuclear 2.0" Reactors -vs- earlier (Fukushima-era) designs that use costly, inefficient Solid Fuel-Rods.

By ~2020, Safe Liquid-Fuel "Nuclear 2.0" reactors will eat existing spent-fuel waste. We must study the differences between Safe, Liquid-Fuel "Nuclear 2.0" Reactors -vs- earlier (Fukushima-era) designs that use costly, inefficient Solid Fuel-Rods.

Photo of IVI Grupp
7 3

Teams

(1) View all

Recent comments

(3) View all

Al Gore trained people to present his 'Inconvenient Truth slide-show, around the World.

Perhaps we need to prepare a similarly informative, multimedia-show & present it locally (eg, to fine-tune it to our local audiences) train inspired other locals to introduce, interact with it (mid-stream), & try to activate attendees.

Some places have special issues (eg, AU still BANS use of Nuclear Energy here).

Other places may have rule-based regs like USA's NRC, that blindly require obsolete (due to LWR assumptions about submitted designs) thicknesses for containment vessels, etc.

Providing lists of needed changes to attendees would give them specific goals to strive for, in their country.

Perhaps a different style than Gore's is called for?

PS Why does the OpenIDEO web site -still- not include "New, Safe, LIQUID-fuel Nuclear Energy" (Molten Salt Reactors) among its options, above?!?

Are we & our ideas in the right place? :-/

MINOR UPDATE:

1. AU has had a Law, making it UNLAWFUL to use Nuclear Energy, since 1999.

(Cf Section 140A of AU's Environment & BioDiversity Conservation Act 1999.)

Kindly use any / all of your influence to help persuade the Australian Gov't to Remove that silly Ban on Nuclear Energy use in AU.

Also, at least one (in our view misguided) Nuclear Energy proponent, in AU, has seemingly focused on GE's rather old, complex & very costly (in our view) IFR / PRISM reactor-technology, which is STILL based on costly SOLID-fuel-rods.

AU should NOT IMO shackle itself to a huge investment in -any- SOLID-fuel-rod based reactor technology.

2a. USA's NRC is said to have inflexible regulations, which make it nearly impossible to win Approval for any "new" Safe type of reactor, that doesn't look like Old Light-Water Reactors ("LWR") - i.e. High Pressure Lower Temperature, SOLID-fuel-rod designs, like those of the Fukushima era.

NRC must change their regulations, to embrace & encourage Safe, Small, LIQUID-fuel Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) to be prototyped, but & used.

2b. By contrast, Canada's Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has regulations that enable designers of "New Nukes" (e.g., Canada's Terrestrial Energy Inc.) to argue the Safety aspects of their designs (e.g., Molten Salt Reactors), in order to reduce time to Approval.

3. There's NO "lack of Federal funding for Nuclear Reseach" - Rather, TOO MUCH of it is going to to Fusion R&D, i.e., rather than "bootstrapping" on the shoulders of smaller MSRs, e.g., for Fusion R&D's energy requirements.

R&D on Fusion Reactor needs to be DELAYED, until MSRs are the source of the very large amounts of Energy which Fusion research requires.

I really don't see Fusion becoming a practical solution, except for those businesses currently (& in past) selling Fusion research labs all the energy used to perform their experimental work.

4a. After Fukushima, Germany shut down all f its Reactors, leading to very high energy costs for home & industries in the country.

4b. By contrast, France's reactors were NOT shut down, allowing France to sell energy to other countries (e.g., UK & Germany, etc.)

4c. Nuclear Energy continues to provide the LOWEST death rate (per TWH of energy), while Coal has on of the highest.

When will OpenIDEO.com include Safe "Nuclear 2.0" Energy, eg, as one of the Energy options for authors to choose, for their Contributions, Ideas, etc.?