OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign up, Login or Learn more

Profile

Recent comments

(1) View all

Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is an unrealistic pipe dream that was part of the COP21 agreement. It is a multi-faceted technology that has not been tried out and it is assumed it could be deployed on a massive scale within 35-years and sustained for many decades after that. The target date of 2050 is unrealistic since Anthropogenic Climate Disruption (ACD) effects are happening so rapidly that the collapse of industrial civilization is likely to take place long before that target date is reached. The underground storage efforts began about two decades ago and have not shown the promise that was expected. Finally, numerous studies have shown that many plants, grown under natural conditions do not fare well under conditions of increasing drought, increasing CO2 concentration above certain levels and increasing temperatures. Links, to articles on this last issue, follow. Typically, these issues have not been included in hopeful presentations on the viability of BECCS.

Trees don't suck up carbon dioxide as hoped
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050822/full/news050822-7.html

Trees absorbing less CO2 as world warms, study finds
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jan/03/climatechange.carbonemissions

Satellite observations show global plant growth is not keeping up with CO2 emissions
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-satellite-global-growth-co2-emissions.html

Scientists just discovered a surprising new factor that could make global warming worse
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/12/09/the-surprising-factor-affecting-carbon-storage-in-the-worlds-forests/

The hidden factor that could undermine U.S. plans to cut carbon emissions
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/11/16/the-hidden-factor-that-could-complicate-u-s-plans-to-cut-carbon-emissions/

Scientists say climate change could cause a ‘massive’ tree die-off in the U.S. Southwest
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/12/21/scientists-say-climate-change-could-cause-a-massive-tree-die-off-in-the-southwest/

Increasingly severe disturbances weaken world's temperate forests
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/08/150829123817.htm

Big Trees First to Die in Severe Droughts
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/big-trees-first-to-die-in-severe-droughts/

Amazon rainforest losing ability to regulate climate, scientist warns
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/31/amazon-rainforest-deforestation-weather-droughts-report

The slow collapse of the world’s forests on The Science Show
http://radio.abc.net.au/programitem/pgQm6yo3q7?play=true

Drought Could Kill Off Many of the World's Trees
http://news.yahoo.com/drought-could-kill-off-many-worlds-trees-144139591.html

NASA satellites reveal something startling about the future of food on Earth
http://beta.finance.yahoo.com/news/nasa-satellites-reveal-something-startling-171000679.html?ltr=1

Tens of Millions of Trees in Danger from California Drought
http://carnegiescience.edu/node/1968


It would be wise to also consider past technologies that were once considered quite hopeful but which turned out to be great embarrassments. One example was the U.S. program called Project Plowshare that had it’s equivalent in the Soviet Russia. The program involved employing nuclear explosives for various civil engineering projects.