OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign up, Login or Learn more

Broken Windows: what might prevent vibrancy

Broken Windows theory states that signaling effects of urban disorder and vandalism on additional crime and anti-social behavior. It has been implemented in several cities including NY. It raises interesting questions for how to design vibrant cities

Photo of Anne-Laure Fayard
8 9

Written by

As people share inspirations of what make their cities or neighborhoods vibrant, I thought that we could also learn by looking at what might make them dangerous and / or non-vibrant. There might be major issues in terms of economics or policies. Yet, there might be other elements to take into account. The broken windows theory provides such elements.

It was first introduced in an article in 1982 in The Atlantic Monthly by 2 social scientists Wilson and Kelling:

"Consider a building with a few broken windows. If the windows are not repaired, the tendency is for vandals to break a few more windows. Eventually, they may even break into the building, and if it's unoccupied, perhaps become squatters or light fires inside. Or consider a sidewalk. Some litter accumulates. Soon, more litter accumulates. Eventually, people even start leaving bags of trash from take-out restaurants there or breaking into cars."

Wilson and Kelling defined 3 factors of why the state of the urban environment may affect crime:

  • social norms and conformity
  • the presence or lack of monitoring
  • social and crime signaling

What the theory implies is that if you see an environment with broken windows and other signals of lack of care (graffiti, littering, buildings falling apart), potential criminals feel safe to engage in criminal activities (because they assume a lack of monitoring) and inhabitants and other visitors are scared and avoid being outside.

Or to use Wilson's words (1997):" Therefore, the objective for preventing street crimes is to prevent the first window from getting broken, or prevent the first graffiti marks, or prevent the first drunkard from a public display. This has led to Neighborhood Watch programs and increased police foot patrols. These measures have not had a significant impact on crime, but they have succeeded in making neighborhood residents feel safer."

This theory has been implemented in several situations, one very famous one being the case of New York, where Kelling was hired as a consultant, and where  it has been claimed to be the cause of the radical decrease of crimes in the 1990's (see for example the discussion of the NY case by Gladwell in The Tipping Point and the article by Kelling:

While the theory has also been implemented with success in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Lowell, Massachussetts, and in the Netherlands, it  has also been heavily debated and criticized.
While it might not be the only explanation of the successes (including New York), it does provide interesting insights.


In case you want to know more, here is a study done by the Standford psychologist Zimbardo to test the Broken Windows theory:

"In 1969, Zimbardo placed one 1959 Oldsmobile auto on a street across from the Bronx campus of New York University (a ghetto area), and one on a street in Palo Alto, California near the Stanford University campus (a rather affluent area). "The license plates of both cars were removed and the hoods opened to provide the necessary releaser signals (Zimbardo, 1969)." Within three days, the car in the Bronx was completely stripped, the result of 23 separate incidents of vandalism. The car in Palo Alto sat unmolested for over a week. Zimbardo and two of his graduate students decided to provide an example by using a sledgehammer to bash the car. They found that after they had taken the first blow, it was extremely difficult to stop. Observers, who were shouting encouragement, finally joined in the vandalism until the car was completely wrecked."


Join the conversation:

Photo of Arjan Tupan

Great addition of a new dimension to this 'debate'. On many occasions reading the inspirations, this theory came to mind. Cleaning up is a good first step, and thinking about what inhibits cities or neighbourhoods to become vibrant is certainly an important part of this inspiration phase. Hurray and applause for this inspiration.

Photo of Anne-Laure Fayard

Thanks Arjan It did often come to my mind. I'm glad you thought of it too.

Photo of Vincent Cheng

Yup was definitely crossing my mind too. Great job explaining the meat of it to us =).

Also, thought that y'all might be interested in learning more about "Devil's Night" as a manifestation of this, in relation to abandoned building blight:

Photo of Arjan Tupan

Vincent, the link to the inspiration you mention does not seem to work. Is it 'published'? I get an OpenIDEO logon screen...

Photo of Vincent Cheng

Hmm...weird. Just worked for me. Try again?

Photo of Arjan Tupan

Weird. Works now. Thanks.

Photo of Anne-Laure Fayard

hi Vincent,
glad you thought of it too and found the description useful. I'll go and check the devil's night.

View all comments