OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign Up / Login or Learn more

How College Works (book recommendation)

Chambliss and Takacs identify some important and not always obvious factors that contribute to positive higher education experiences.

Photo of Dan Ryan
3 3

Written by

This richly researched book (How College Works by Daniel F. Chambliss and Christopher G. Takacs) describes a number of factors - not statistical factors but things that people do or things that can be fostered or made more likely to happen - that characterize positive experiences in residential higher education. Some will wave these away because the research was done at an elite private liberal arts college, but keep an open mind - these things may be easier or harder to accomplish depending on resources and student situation, but they might also be important across the board.

Specifically, please check all that apply:

  • An Individual

Tell us about your work experience:

Social scientist teaching research methods, design thinking, mathematical modeling, and phenomenology. At Mills College, Oakland, CA since 1998. Director InnovationLab@Mills. Iovine Young Academy for Arts, Technology, and the Business of Innovation 2014-15. Founder TheCityRoom@ISPS at Yale way back when.

What is a provocation or insight that might inspire others during this challenge?

Sometimes we need to ask not "what would work?" but "what does work?"

3 comments

Join the conversation:

Comment
Spam
Photo of Colin

Dan, I also enjoyed this book. I took four things away from it that I think will stick with me:

(1) Universities/colleges are more similar than they are diverse. I'm at a large state school, but the envy students (and faculty) reported when passing the well endowed science labs on their hill at the college mimic the attitudes that many feel toward engineering here.

(2) Innovations that work can be mundane and unpublishable. Although high impact practices work, if you're a dean with the pressing problem that you have a curmudgeonly, misogynist professor nearing retirement, the thing to do is to give him an 8am class to teach and hope no one turns up.

(3) The unit of analysis should be the student, not institutional units. It doesn't matter what proportion of a university's classes are small (well, it does to USN&WR), but it really matters what proportion of classes are small that an average student takes. These numbers can be very different.

(4) MOOCs have been around for centuries. They were called books. A HS student today could buy a used calculus text for a couple of bucks, and learn everything that Newton discovered in a couple of months. But the average student doesn't, and that won't change with online materials. What college provides that self-directed reading/viewing does not, is structure/discipline and curation.

View all comments