This informative piece highlights a number of insights, the least of which is that we're all curious. Building from the bottom up, Rothstein and Santana share how powerful careful inquiry can be when developing confidence, comprehension, and passion in and with students, especially when focused on communal projects.
Their project started about 25 years ago when trying to address the drop-out rate of high school students in their local area - an issue closely tied to SES.
As we worked together to increase parent involvement in education, we heard parents state the same problem over and over again: “We’re not going to the schools because we don’t even know what to ask.”
In order to address this problem, they developed a six step approach.
Facilitator Designs a Question Focus - This is non-question that provokes curiosity and incites imagination surrounding a general topic (e.g. "Debt is one person's liability, but another person's asset." - Paul Krugman).
Students Create Questions - Leave it to the students to create their questions around the QFocus by using four rules:
Ask as many questions as you can.
Do not stop to discuss, judge, or answer any of the questions.
Write down every question exactly as it was stated.
Change any statements into questions.
Students Improve Their Questions - Students compare and contrast their questions with their peers while identifying any important variables they missed and honing in on the differences between open-ended and closed questions, etc.
Students Prioritize Their Questions - The facilitator provides charitable guidelines and allows the students to organize their questions based on specified criteria (e.g. in the case of financial literacy, "Choose three questions related to debt." or "Choose three questions related to your community.").
Decide Together On Next Steps - Everyone, including the facilitator, shares their questions and democratically chooses which ones to pursue collectively.
Make the Process Transparent - Students reflect on the steps they took while hearing suggestions from the facilitator and sharing individual insights with their peers.
At the end of the process, Rothstein and Santana reflect by sharing:
Teachers tell us that using the QFT consistently increases participation in group and peer learning processes, improves classroom management, and enhances their efforts to address inequities in education....After using the six-step process outlined above, [one teacher] was struck by “how the students went farther, deeper, and asked questions more quickly than ever before.”
The takeaway for me is that (these) questions are meaningful for everyone to be asking. More than this, by focusing first on cultivating a democratic culture of empathetic inquiry that implicates the people being served, we can hope to solve not just financial disenfranchisement, but many of the other issues facing us collectively.
I'm eager to hear your thoughts!