OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign Up / Login or Learn more

In-home behavioral monitoring as a tool for confident, independent living (updated 30/05 - User Testing and Final Deck)

Curo has built a monitoring product that is tracking data which may be indicative of a potential fall.

Photo of Rob Deeming
13 16

Written by

Who is your idea designed for and how does it enable older adults to live their best possible life by preventing falls?

Curo is designed for the care hierarchies that exist around older adults. Our product provides behavioral data that we hope can be indicative of a range of challenges at home, including falls. If we focus on behavioral patterns that often proceed a fall, it may be possible to look for and identify these behaviors and alert the family/caregivers when a fall is likely to occur in the near future.


Changes in behavior, particularly in seniors can indicate an increased likelihood of a fall. These changes can be very subtle can take place over an extended period of time, which make them difficult to detect through human observation alone. If an elderly person is living alone, it is even more likely that these signs will be missed. 

By using passively collected data from easy to install sensors in the home, Curo can identify those key signals associated with an increased likelihood of falls.

This information can be shared with family and caregivers in a timely manner, along with critical information about the cause of the decline. With this information, family members or caregivers can respond appropriately to reduce the risk of falls.


According to the World Health Organization (WHO) there are 4 areas which influence the likelihood of a fall:

1. Biological

2. Behavioral (Our area of focus)

3. Environmental (Secondary area of focus)

4. Socioeconomic

Furthermore, WHO have established a three-stage prevention model to lower the risks of falls:

1. Build awareness of the importance of fall prevention

2. Improve identification and assessment of risk factors. (Our area of focus)

3. Identify and implement realistic and effective intervention. (Secondary area of focus)

Curo will address this by:

Relating to “Improve identification and assessment of risk factors” (2) in the prevention model:

1. Determining (and defining exactly) which our data points have the strongest correlation with increased risk. Based on WHO, these are likely to include:

- Decline in movement (Physical activity)

- Medication usage

- Temperature in the home (Environmental)

- Food preparation (Healthy eating)

- Leaving the house (Social interaction)

2. Create a risk algorithm based on the occurrence (or otherwise) of the above behaviors (none, low, medium high).  

1. None - no behaviors associated with increased risk of fall have been observed

2. Low - one of the behaviors has been observed

3. Medium - either; one of the behaviors more than once OR two distinct behaviors have been observed

4.High - combination of multiple behaviors and multiple frequencies of events have been observed 

Relating to “Identify and implement realistic and effective intervention” (3) in the prevention model:

3. Inform / Alert caregiver and/or family of increased risk.  

4. To ensure that we address the WHO’s need for “realistic & effective” intervention, we will not just alert caregivers, but also provide information on what behaviors specifically have to lead to the increased risk.  Therefore allowing for more informed care decisions to take place.

5. Post intervention, Curo can monitor to determine success or failure of integration and care provision (i.e falls risk will decrease if successful)



Curo is an established health-tech startup who have spent the last two years developing this product to keep elderly people in their homes longer. The team of 7 people have a background in digital consulting, development, product management, and entrepreneurship and are based in Melbourne & Sydney Australia and Ann Arbor, Michigan.


There are a number of competitors in the senior health monitoring space.  However, the balance of costs/usability and insight from each system varies greatly.  The existing options typically have three shortcomings with Curo does not:

1) Fixed 'hardwired' systems. This makes them difficult to install (i.e requiring an electrician) & difficult to redeploy.  Therefore competitors to Curo are typically found in facilities where the system can be left in place semi-permanently.  Curo's major differentiator here is that the system can easily be installed by anyone in the home environment.  The home environment is key, as this is where early prevention can best occur.  

2) Hardware-focused companies.  Unlike Curo's competitors, Curo makes use of existing off-the-shelf IoT sensors, making it hardware agnostic. This means as the technology changes/improves, Curo will continue to use modern equipment produced by the largest IoT companies in the world (i.e Samsung, Amazon, Belkin etc).

REFINEMENT PHASE - Kickoff Session

To kick off the Refinement Phase of the Challenge, we met up in the Curo offices in Melbourne. We went through the existing Curo product and brainstormed ways in which we could use the existing data collected by Curo to identify and reduce falls risk. 



We decided to focus on family members using the product (Curo is aimed at both family members and professional care providers). The reason family members were chosen in this instance was to simplify the experience and allow us to prototype and test part of the solution quickly and easily. 


We went through our User Journey and used the "Determining What to Prototype" tool to help us prioritize what to prototype for this challenge. We began by looking at each step of the User Journey and asking "What is the Most Important Question to Answer" for each stage, followed by ideas on "How We Might Test It".

This lead us to focus on two key questions: "How might family members be informed of an increase in falls risk?" followed by "How might they react?" and "How would we want them to react?"

To test this we decided to mock up of a fall risk indicator on top of the existing Curo app. We decided this could then be shown and discussed with family members to ascertain how they might react and gauge how effective the falls risk indicator is at communicating the risk while not causing panic and distress.


We refined our user journey and added two personas, John and his daughter Mary, to better explain the concept. These can be viewed in the slide deck below.


Using the existing Curo app as a base, we mocked up two different versions of fall risk indicators, one in which falls risk was communicated more directly and in graduated stages and one with more general recommendations based on the severity of the falls risk. Our hypothesis was that by communicating falls risk on a scale of 1-4 for example, a family member might be more distressed than if that information was presented more as general recommendations (while still alerting them when an urgent intervention needed to be made.) This was one of the key assumptions we wished to test with the prototype.


Questions we want to test
1. How do family members react when seeing a change notification. How are they responding? Are we creating unnecessary stress? What do they think each notification means?

2. What is the best metric to communicate change?
Do you call it falls risk, or just notifying that something is changing?
What is the best language to communicate change?

How will we test this?
Put the prototype in front of someone. “If you saw this warning, what would this evoke for you? What would you want to do in response?”

Test Overview
We conducted tests with two participants in the Curo offices.
We took both versions of the prototype and presented it to the participants, asking them to talk through their thoughts as they interacted with each one. 

Participant 1

Participant 2


Both participants drastically preferred prototype A. Overall they both found it much clearer and easier to understand.

Both participants during the testing told unprompted stories about grandparents who had recently passed away and expressed the wish that they had had Curo.  

  • In Rebecca’s case, they pro-actively removed the family member from their home (against will) because of concern specifically about a fall. 
  • In Elias’s case, they were unaware of the difficulties the family member was having in the lead up to passing away.  Elias believed this ‘fall prevention feature’ that we are testing within Curo would have certainly helped them better understand what he was going through.


Our internal discussions had focused largely on Prototype B. We had believed that a softer approach (i.e Education rather than alerts) would be more meaningful to the user.  However, the testing showed a clear bias in favor of prototype A.

We had overestimated the ‘panic’ that might be caused by displaying a fall risk and underestimated users desire to get straight to the point (i.e there is a low risk of fall). 

Although the user testing didn’t cover the recommendations, both confirmed the importance of making relevant recommendations after having made an assessment. For example “if meals are identified as a problem, what are some tips to help specifically with that”.

What early, lightweight experiment might you try out in your own community to find out if the idea will meet your expectations?

If we better understand behaviors that tend to come before a fall, we can create specific tasks in our existing product to spot those behaviors in the homes of older adults. We can correlate that data to reports of whether/when a fall has happened, in turn testing the validity of using behavioral data to predict falls. If this is validated, we can set up notifications to alert an older adult's care hierarchy that a fall may happen, and actions that can be taken to help prevent it.

What skills, input, or guidance from the OpenIDEO community would be most helpful in building out or refining your idea?

We would value guidance from behavioural specialists and researchers who have proof points or theories around the behaviours that typically proceed falls. We have the ability to test lots of things, we would benefit from insight on what to look for!

How long has your idea existed?

  • Over 1 year

This idea emerged from

  • A group brainstorm

Tell us about your work experience:

Curo is an established health-tech startup who have spent the last two years developing this product. We have a background in digital consulting, development, product management, and entrepreneurship and have offices in Melbourne, Australia and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

How would you describe this idea while in an elevator with someone?

Today, Curo already passively collects behavioral data from the homes of seniors. The next step is to identify which parts of our data set can specifically indicate the increased likelihood of a fall in the future. By identifying and isolating key influences of falls within our data, we can inform caregivers earlier not just about the increased likelihood, but also the key areas to focus on.

How does your idea demonstrate our Criteria of Affordability?

Curo exists as a commercially available product both in the United States and in Australia. It uses a combination of affordable IoT sensors and the Curo software platform to bring remote monitoring to the masses. Furthermore, by sharing critical wellbeing data directly with family, we reduce the need for expensive 24/7 call centers or response teams. This challenge is about adding a very valuable piece to Curo (fall prevention) without changing the underlying cost of the solution.

How does your idea demonstrate or plan to demonstrate scalability?

Curo currently partners with the 3rd largest Health Insurer in Australia (HCF). The ability to scale our solution through their membership is a key channel to market which can be replicated across other health insurers.

How do you plan to measure the impact of your idea?

Curo is about to launch its next pilot in Melbourne, Australia involving 500 senior participants. This project will be measuring the outcomes which are important to us including: volume, severity and cause of hospitalisations. Our intention is to validate that using the Curo solution improves each of those key metrics. Importantly, if we were to roll out this fall prevention project within that pilot, we will be able to statistically validate the lower number of falls during the pilot.

What are your immediate next steps after the challenge?

Further user testing will be helpful to refine the user experience around Prototype A, in particular, finalizing the recommendations specific to the identified fall influencers will support users in their chosen intervention. Once the user experience is finalized, the next step is to determine the efficacy of the algorithm that we have built.
View more

Team (4)

Sarah's profile
Sarah Halliday

Role added on team:

"Sarah is an OpenIDEO Community Prototyper who is mentoring the team during the Refinement Phase of the Challenge. She has a background in interaction and visual design and 9 years experience as a Registered Nurse. Her LinkedIn profile can be viewed here:"

Rob's profile
Tim's profile
Tim McDougall

Role added on team:

"Tim is Co-founder of Curo. He has spent the last 10 years as an entrepreneur and digital consultant, predominately helping private businesses and government take advantage of the changing digital landscape. His LinkedIn profile can be viewed here:"

Matt's profile
Matt McDougall

Role added on team:

"Matt is Co-founder of Curo. He brings 2 years of experience as an industry-leading developer. He previously set up and sold a development agency to Australia’s premier Drupal agency. His LinkedIn profile can be viewed here:"

View more

Attachments (6)

Curo - User experience map.pdf

This is the first version of the user experience map developed by the Curo team (relating to falls prevention.)

Curo - Determining What to Prototype.pdf

This OpenIDEO tool was used to help the Curo team determine what to prototype and prioritize certain sections of the user experience.


FRAT (Falls Risk Assessment Tools) are used across all Australian hospitals and aged care providers to assess falls risk in patients. Assessments are generally made on patient admission and are reviewed regularly by allied health staff (often weekly in acute care scenarios). This specific FRAT tool was developed by the Peninsula Health Falls Prevention Service (Victoria). This tool has been used by the Curo team to help define specific indicators that increase falls risk.

WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age.pdf

This World Health Organization report includes international and regional perspectives on falls prevention issues and strategies. It is the product of conclusions and recommendations made at the WHO Technical Meeting on Falls Prevention in Older Age in Victoria, Canada in February 2007. This article was used by the Curo team to help define specific indicators that increase falls risk.

Curo Overview IDEO.pdf

This is an example of a Curo pitch deck, explaining the original concept.

Curo Demo Day Presentation IDEO.pdf

This is an example of a Curo pitch deck, explaining the original concept.


Join the conversation:

Photo of Imran  khan

When I search a keyword on google search engine then I have found your website. I really like your website and your content both are in a good manner and quality based. I'm also working as a content writer at GomodAPK. GomodAPK is an Android Apps based website platform that provides 100% free &amp; safe Android APKs and latest tech news, updates, reviews and Howto Guide. If you want to see my work click here. I have also written some articles on KissAnime Movies you can see them <a href="">here</a>.

View all comments