OpenIDEO is an open innovation platform. Join our global community to solve big challenges for social good. Sign Up / Login or Learn more

A Network of Local Focused OpenIDEO Challenges, To Serve The Communities We Live In

One way OpenIDEO might evolve is to create a subset of challenges where OpenIDEOers can take a more local approach to solving challenges.

Photo of Kenneth Walton
8 6

Written by

There are a number of local OpenIDEO meetup groups like ours here Washington DC- OpenIDEO DC. Something that we have been discussing is having a bigger focus on working with local stakeholder groups to solve local problems.

I think a way that OpenIDEO might evolve is to create a subset of challenges where OpenIDEOers can take a more local approach to solving challenges. In that way each of the winners have a better chance of implementing their solution, and building their local OpenIDEO community.

This is a salient issue every time we work on a challenge in DC. In order for our teams to do the necessary user research involved in formulating a prototype which can be tested, we need to localize OpenIDEO global challenges to an accessible stakeholder group. It would be beneficial for local chapters to have the ability to do this formally instead of feeling like we might be off-track with the global challenge. For example, providing a way to showcase localized challenges based on the density of the population (e.g., urban, suburban, rural, etc.) and level of development (e.g., GNP per capita as proposed by a paper from the World Bank: 

http://www.worldbank.org/depweb/beyond/beyondco/beg_02.pdf)

 Logan Powell OpenIDEO DC

It would also be a big help to have more structured conversation and resources around implementation phases as well. After effectively localizing a challenge and developing an innovative solution, it would be a huge help to continue to leverage the OpenIDEO community wisdom and network to move local solutions forward. Whether that looks like connecting to a network of potential community partners, leveraging OpenIDEO to further inroads with local government or nonprofits, or something else entirely--it's crucial that projects not be left in the "great idea! now if only we could launch a startup" phase if we're going to make a lasting difference in people's lives and in our local communities.

Jo Golden OpenIDEO DC

If you'd like your name to appear in our report on open innovation, please include it below as you'd like it to appear.

Ken Walton OpenIDEO DC

8 comments

Join the conversation:

Comment
Photo of Kenneth Walton
Team

Agreed Erik, Our group has had a lot of conversation around this, Logan who's lead our team  has given a great deal of thought to the idea. There is a pretty good size group of people in our area with an interest in human centered design; involved in meet up groups like OpenIDEO. Many of these people  are looking for ways to have a positive impact on the local community. There are also a lot of non-profit and government agencies who need help solving big problems. So we are in a good position to make things happen here, with the support of OpenIDEO.

Photo of Erik Mooij
Team

Hello Kenneth and the rest, I really like this idea a lot! It will be so much more meaningful for local meetup groups to work both on global challenges and on local impact as well. I think this an evolvement that the meetup program could really benefit from to engage even more people.

Photo of Kenneth Walton
Team

Aaron,

Yes, but it would need to be flexible enough to work with the array of unique solutions that are developed in the challenges. It would also need to offer funding opportunities, and support from OpenIDEO . I was lucky to be a winner of an OpenIDEO Challenge, and a little while after the announcement OpenIDEO offered a crowd funding opportunity to get the project moving, but it was a little late and I had already lost momentum. If a process for success was in place when the winners were announced I think there could be more projects
implemented.  

Photo of Aaron Wong
Team

Do you think people would benefit from a road-map of sorts to help groups take ideas into the implementation phase?

Photo of Jo Golden
Team

It would also be a big help to have more structured conversation and resources around implementation phases as well. After effectively localizing a challenge and developing an innovative solution, it would be a huge help to continue to leverage the OpenIDEO community wisdom and network to move local solutions forward. Whether that looks like connecting to a network of potential community partners, leveraging OpenIDEO to further inroads with local government or nonprofits, or something else entirely--it's crucial that projects not be left in the "great idea! now if only we could launch a startup" phase if we're going to make a lasting difference in people's lives and in our local communities.

Photo of Kenneth Walton
Team

That is great!! Our OpenIDEO DC team has very strong feelings about solving local problems, and being able to see projects through to implementation. We have led Hack-a Thons with the local DC government, and have others planned in the near future. It feels great to see things getting done, using the platforms process as a method for solving a few local problems. We believe that if OpenIDEO can evolve in any direction that can include more opportunities to address local issues, that we will be able to see more local projects being implemented.

Photo of OpenIDEO
Team

Congrats on this being today's Featured Contribution!

Photo of Logan Powell
Team

This is a salient issue every time we work on a challenge in DC. In order for our teams to do the necessary user research involved in formulating a prototype which can be tested, we need to localize OpenIDEO global challenges to an accessible stakeholder group. It would be beneficial for local chapters to have the ability to do this formally instead of feeling like we might be off-track with the global challenge. For example, providing a way to showcase localized challenges based on the density of the population (e.g., urban, suburban, rural, etc.) and level of development (e.g., GNP per capita as proposed by a paper from the World Bank: http://www.worldbank.org/depweb/beyond/beyondco/beg_02.pdf).