National Framework for Inclusive Governance and Local Development in Sierra Leone
Development from the inside-out
*Please Upload User Experience Map (as attachment) and any additional insights gathered from Beneficiary Feedback in this field
For our user experience research we focused on how women can interact with the People's Planning Process. We visited a group of Peace Mothers who were part of the first Fambul Tok intervention -the community healing process and the bonfires- but were not one of the PPP pilots. A key takeaway was that without the larger system (the PPP and IDC process), the Peace Mother structure was a good local intervention but was not as effective as when fully linked in the larger inclusive gov. system.
We focused the user mapping experience on how the voice of women is brought into the People Planning Process (PPP). This is a very specific but important topic for the PPP and the inclusive governance work given the traditional views in Sierra Leone on women's involvement in public decision making.
We did our user mapping exercise with about 35 women in Senbehun Village, Nyanhun section, Kailahun District on Thursday 12 July, 2018.
The meeting took about an hour and overall the women were very animated and we all enjoyed the conversation.
While we met primarily with the women from the Peace Mothers' group in the village, young men and children were all gathered around and listened to the conversation.
To begin to give people a better overview about the participants in our process we also decided to undertake 4 empathy mappings. The first map is of Jarad Foday, the Public Relations Officer at the IDC in Moyamba District. He was just in Kailahun District attending the Kailahun IDC meeting to share with them the Moyamba IDC's experience setting up a structure to support revenue sharing between the Paramount Chiefs and the district councils. Sharing stories is critical in IDC development.
The second mapping is of Isata Ndoleh. She is the Vice Chair of the Kailahun IDC. She has been with the IDC from the beginning. She was initially proposed to be the Chair of the committee when the Paramount Chief refused because "women should not be leaders of men." She quietly agreed to be the vice chair. But last year when the elections were ongoing, the former IDC Chair stepped down, and she was the acting chair for 6 months. She showed women can be excellent leaders.
The third person we highlight is Gbongo. He fled during the war and only returned to the district after the war ended. When he first come back he worked as a journalist and helped to start the district's first community radio station -- still operating 14 years later. Today he is the District Development Officer, supporting the District Council to implement development projects. He knows from experience that communities need to be empowered to fully participate in the process.
The last mapping is of Lilian Morsay. Lilian is who we call Mama Peace Mothers. She started as one of the original peace mothers and then joined the Fambul Tok staff and began to coordinate their efforts. Through her passion and commitment to support women to have a voice in their communities the Peace Mother movement continues to grow nationally. Lilian has also shared about the Peace Mothers internationally, inspiring others with the success of the program and approach.
This is the full People's Planning Process map. We tried to map out how the complex system works from the most local level (villages) up to Chiefdom level (like a county), and how that connects to the District. The Wan Fambul framework will enable this process in every chiefdom. The map was created last year through a process similar to User Mapping. What we have figured recently is the next mapping process we need to do is in how Inclusive District/Chiefdom Committees are formed.
Why does the target community define this problem as urgent and/or a priority? How is the idea leveraging and empowering community assets to help create an environment for success? (1000 characters)
The PPP and the broader inclusive organizing process grew out of Fambul Tok’s post-war community reconciliation work and the needs that came from responding to and recovering from the Ebola crisis. Fambul Tok started its work with community reconciliation in response to the externally-driven recovery and development efforts after the war. Most efforts were ‘outside-in’ and did not address the needs or utilize the resources of the communities and community members most impacted by the war. The concepts, design, expertise, leadership and resources came from outside the impacted communities rather than from the communities themselves. Through an inclusive community-centered process, Fambul Tok facilitated the creation of community structures that led their own reconciliation efforts as well as follow-up peace and development initiatives, such as the formation of the Peace Mothers – a women’s group designed to bring women’s leadership to community improvement initiatives.
This photo shows the Chiefdom Inclusive Committee (CIC) of Upper Bambara Chiefdom validating their People's Plan. The plan was an accumulation of all the village and section plans and was reviewed and discussed for several days. One participant said, "I feel like a Sierra Leonean for the first time." This is the culminating activity on the PPP map. The Chiefdom People's Plan is given to the District Council, where it is integrated into the District's development plan.
Koinadugu DC Sheku Kamara said the IDC made his job “60%” easier. Here, Chief Jalloh, the Paramount Chief from Neini Chiefdom gives his Chiefdom People's Plan to then District Council Chair (and IDC Chair) Sheku Kamara in 2016. He came with people from across his Chiefdom who had participated in developing and validating the Plan. Their presentation inspired Koinadugu to form its IDC and work to cascade the PPP across the district. The people of Neini began implementing their plan right away.
Inter-district learning and sharing is a big part of the success of the approach, and it has helped the program grow and strengthen in deep ways. Rural Sierra Leone is isolated and it is not easy to learn from your neighbors. The Wan Fambul approach has been intentional about helping communities, districts and the national level learn from people's own stories and experiences. It focuses a lot of time and energy on bringing people together to share and learn with each other.
Fambul Tok staff are training community members in this photo, as part of the PPP. The results of the approach are far-reaching. Chief Jalloh explained how because of the PPP his Chiefdom raised money among themselves and the diaspora to build their own much needed bridge. They bought the cement and provided the labor, "cajoled" the DC into providing the engineers - and got their bridge built, after years of it never being done by the district or national gov’t.
The Peace Mothers stepped up during the Ebola crisis and knew what needed to be done in their communities. They were trusted in their communities, so they could be very effective at education about Ebola prevention. This was in contrast to government and other outside efforts, which were often met with huge distrust in communities. This shows how having strong local networks can help prevent crises, and/or help address them more effectively when they occur.
How does the idea fit within the larger ecosystem that surrounds it? Urgent needs are usually a symptom of a larger issue that rests within multiple interrelated symptoms - share what you know about the context surrounding the problem you are aiming to solve. (500 characters)
During the Ebola crisis, the structures FT supported in communities, especially the Peace Mothers, mobilized prevention and response work from within their communities. It was effective. In contrast, the pattern of national and international response, once again repeated ‘outside-in’ patterns, ignoring community voices and missing the opportunity to mobilize local engagement and leadership. This led to an effort between FT, and the Ministry of Local Government to fill the gap nationally.
How does the idea affect or change the fundamental nature of the larger ecosystem that surrounds it (as described above) in a new and/or far-reaching way? (500 characters)
Today in Sierra Leone community voices are still not put in the centre of the conversation. The Wan Fambul Framework is a national effort to organize community voices, so they can interface with externals (those outside their direct community and those from a national or international level) to mobilize community resources and request specific aid supporting community priorities and initiative. The national framework changes everything, and brings people into the center for the first time.
Development that is people and community-centered hears the voices from the Inside out. By providing a process for mobilizing communities to lead their own recovery and development, combined with structures for implementing and sustaining that development, the PPP creates space for people and communities to lead. By creating inclusive District structures that link to the local ones, the IDCs provide the critical infrastructure to link the local to the national, which the Framework will enable.
What will be different within the target community as a result of implementing the idea? What is the scope and scale of that difference? How long will it take to see that difference and how will it be sustained beyond BridgeBuilder support? (500 characters)
The change will be sustained by the structures the WFNF supports. The structures will have both the capacity and the mandate to lead and sustain the PPP in an ongoing way. Actors at all levels will be empowered to direct resources to serve people’s needs/agendas. It will take 3 months to see the differences at the local level; 6-12 months to see sustained change at the District level and in new districts. National impacts will be both ongoing and incremental, some immediate and some longer term.
The village of Kpangulgo since working on their People's Plan began to work to construct their own court barray (village meeting space). The Chief donated the land for public use, the youth made the bricks, and the women planted crops to sell in order to buy the plaster and the iron sheets for the roof. The structures the PPP put in place (the Community Welfare and Mediation Committee - CWMC- and the Peace Mothers) led the process and mobilized the rest of the community.
Soap making was one of the ways the Peace Mothers were able to stop the spread of Ebola. Give the history of conflict and marginalization of the rural areas of the country, when the Ebola virus first started to spread, most people did not trust the government's warnings about the disease. Peace Mothers were trusted neighbors and were more believable. These Peace Mothers were able to scale up their soap-making and distribute to other Peace Mother groups nationally.
Here is a group of Peace Mothers who are harvesting their group's ground nuts in Kwellu village. The proceeds from this project will support school fees for children who parents can not send them to school. Peace Mothers groups decide what market initiatives they want to take on together, and then they collectively decide how to use the proceeds.
In this photo Fadugu Madingo in Koinadugu District is just starting to build their community center, a priority need they identified in going through their PPP. When people believe they have a voice they also take on a new level of engagement in the world around them. The CWMCs helped mobilize this process.
How has the idea evolved or responded to your user research during the Beneficiary Feedback Phase and any further insights provided if you participated in the Expert Feedback Phase? (1000 characters)
The WFNF is designed to listen to, learn from and adapt program design from 'beneficiary feedback' as part of its modus. And for this application we had a focused user research phase that illuminated how activities and structures without the overall inclusive supporting system do not allow for as much impact for women's leadership in community decision making. Just creating activities and local structures is not enough. The supportive system is necessary for them to function fully. Aggregating the PPP at the Chiefdom level provides a critical system to support and strengthen the local actors. The longer term support is the IDC, and how it connects to the Chiefdom, which in turn connects to the local -while also being able to connect to the national. This is why a systemic approach to the link between governance and peacebuilding/development is required. As we move forward with the national roll-out phase, this feedback is helping to develop the ways of linking structures to systems.
What are the key steps for implementation in the next 1-3 years? (You can attach a timeline or GANTT chart in place of a written plan, if desired.) (1000 characters)
We are requesting 15 months of funding to kick off the national program -- to get it moving right away and strengthen the foundation as longer-term funds are raised by the government and other partners. We wish to start with a national dialogue and consultations taking the draft framework to every district in the country asking people to improve the framework and make it serve their needs. This type of comprehensive national consultation has never been done. The pilot District IDCs and Fambul Tok will work with the MOPED and MLGRD to guide the consultation process. The consultation process will be done in a way that jump starts the establishment of the IDCs in the new Districts and helps identify key local government and civil society leaders to work with in those Districts. We want to work with this broader group of leaders to roll out the PPP/IDC in a new District, which will support critical experiential training for new implementers of the process and for FT staff as trainers.
Gannt chart for the Wan Fambul National Framework (WFNF) -- 15 months
Describe the individual or team that will implement this idea (if a partnership, please explain breakdown of roles and responsibilities for each entity). (Feel free to share an organizational chart or visual description of your team). (500 characters)
The Wan Fambul Secretariat, housed at Fambul Tok, is the working body to support the ongoing design, development, implementation and monitoring of the WFF. It will be the technical coordinating arm of the collaborative partnership. The Nat’l Government will provide oversight and policy guidance, with leadership from the Office of the Vice President. MoPED will be the policy level lead & focus on building to a national People’s Plan; MLGRD will lead implementation & focus on the IDC process.
This chart shows the process-structures that are/will be created through the Wan Fambul Framework, and the corresponding legal structures they are parallel to. The graphic was made when the MLGRD was the primary government partner. That has since changed, and the WFF will be coordinated through two Ministries - the MLGRD and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MOPED), and with leadership from the Office of the Vice President.
What aspects of the idea would potential BridgeBuilder funds primarily support? (500 characters)
We are requesting BridgeBuilder funds to support the national kick-off dialogue and nation-wide District level consultations (in 10 of the 16 Districts) for the WFF, and also funds to pilot the PPP/IDC process in Kono District, which would be a new district. This would be strengthening the foundation for future WFF implementation in critical ways. And finally we would seek support to fund Secretariat activities--the critical work of strengthening the 'national cup' to prepare for full rollout.
In preparation for our Expert Feedback Phase: What are three unanswered questions or challenges that you could use support on in your project? These questions will be answered directly by experts matched specifically to your idea and needs.
1. Today the space for civil society engagement is shrinking across the world. What can be done to expand civil society space in developing countries?
2. How can our partnership with the government and others continue to ensure communities remain the main drivers of their own development? When things are scaled how do we protect the process so that it does not become just another business as usual process, where political expediency overrides community needs?
3. Assume government and civil society are collaborating on a specific initiative. How do you ensure sustained engagement after a national or local election when there is a new government? Are there ways to help makes sure one does not have to fully start over again?
Final Updates (*Please do not complete until we reach the Improve Phase*): How has the idea evolved or responded to your user research during the Beneficiary Feedback Phase and any further insights provided if you participated in the Expert Feedback Phase? (1000 characters)
Our evolution has happened mostly at the national and governmental level. The new government was just taking office as we started this application. Since that time, our relationships with them have gotten clearer and stronger. They are also a 'beneficiary' of the process, and the feedback from them made it clear that in the new government we needed to work with the Ministry of Planning and Development, in addition to the MLGRD. The Vice President indicated he wanted the Framework to help the two Ministries develop healthy collaborative capacity and that his office would help lead that process. With Catalyst for Peace we have designed a learning and planning retreat for both Ministers and the Min. of State for the Office of the VP to be held the first week of September in Washington, DC. Getting out of the country is critical for high level leaders to be able to focus fully, to gain a depth of understanding of the Framework, to cement relationships and to do the next phase of planning.
During this Improve Phase, please use the space below to add any additional information to your proposal.
FROM CATALYST FOR PEACE:
We have seen how building peace and development from the inside-out not only requires new ways of working from communities, from local development stakeholders including local government, from civil society organizations facilitating the process, and ultimately from both the national and local governments - but it also requires new ways of working as funders, and new kinds of funder/recipient relationships. Catalyst for Peace has been both the primary funder and core program partner in this work since the beginning of Fambul Tok, and together we have modeled a mutually healthy relationship, representative of the how funding is not separate from the larger process of social transformation, but rather how it can be a part of that larger process, and a healthy part at that. As we move to implement the Wan Fambul National Framework we recognize that the Framework will not only be working nationally (the work of which is what is already most fully outline in this proposal) but will also have a global dimension, especially through the funding of the process, which after this initial phase is likely to be mostly large (government and IGO) funders. So far, for example, we have had interest and some funding from UNDP and the USG, and also interest and conversation with the JICA, EU, World Bank, and DFID. We see this upcoming phase (for which we are requesting BridgeBuilder funding) as critical in strengthening the national 'container' for engaging the conversation with other government and IGO funding entities from a position of national strength. Catalyst for Peace is especially eager to broaden the global conversation about how to fund local peacebuilding and development but at a national scale - how to fund/support peace and development from the inside-out. We (CfP) also recognize that we will need more voices and more support for that conversation, especially when working with large government and IGO entities. We have seen how private foundations have unique potential not only to work creatively, but also to convene and host conversations with government/IGO funding in ways local and even national peacebuilding actors cannot. We would welcome GHR's partnership in the global funding process and conversation, and, if it is of interest to GHR, we would invite not just funding but also partnership in this next phase of the Wan Fambul National Framework implementation. We can envision intentional collaborative work focused on how to help global funding mechanisms serve the fulfillment of local leadership potential, rather than (even if unintentionally) subvert or deplete it. We could see this collaboration having many potential interested audiences, even beyond the direct scope of this proposal. We have seen from our own experience how having a grounded in-practice context allows conversations to expand learning and impact in uniquely powerful ways. The time is ripe to make significant impact in helping funding accomplish its intended purposes more fully and effectively, and we are convinced the Wan Fambul National Framework process can make a powerful contribution to helping that happen. We aim to strengthen and grow our capacity to do that, hopefully with GHR partnership.
Note that you may also edit any of your previous answers within the proposal. Here is a great place to note any big final changes or iterations you have made to your proposal below:
There are no big changes to our proposal. It is something we have been working to develop through beneficiary feedback for the past 3-4 years. The one thing thing which has developed over the past three months as we interacted with the OpenIdeo platform is the new Government of Sierra Leone has fully endorsed the Wan Fambul National Framework, even though it was developed in partnership with the leadership of the former government. In an extremely heated, partisan environment such as post-election Sierra Leone this unheard of. The Wan Fambul National Framework was created in a non-partisan, people-focused manner. It is encouraging the new government has recognized the importance of building a people-centered focused national development plan and are ready to work with the foundation which was developed in the 3 pilot districts.
Wan Fambul in the Sierra Leonean Krio language means: We are all one family. It represents that there is a place for everyone in the civic space. The Wan Fambul National Framework bridges Peace, Prosperity, and Planet.
The different core elements of the
Wan Fambul Framework all work together
to overcome the barriers that hinder a
comprehensive and coordinated approach
to full devolution in Sierra Leone. The issues
regarding the need for recovery and healing, tangible development, and increased civic engagement through bringing more stakeholders into the conversation cannot be isolated from processes to increase the level of full and complete devolution as it relates to the District Councils’ mandate.
Like thousands of ordinary people in Sierra Leone, I knew the reconciliation process had done little to heal the real wounds of the civil war (1991-2002). By 2007, millions of dollars had gone into a Special Court which prosecuted only nine men; and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission – while it served to help catalogue the broader story of the war – it never reached the ordinary villagers most impacted by the war. I had a vision for a different kind of locally based reconciliation process.
Fambul Tok first began its reconciliation work in Sierra Leone with consultations with community leaders in all 14 districts. Based on the results gleaned from the consultations, the pilot implementation of the program began in January, 2008 in Kailahun District, where the war started in 1991. As the program expanded extensive community reconciliation structures were established, and over 250 sectional level ceremonies were facilitated where tens of thousands of people participated.
During the community ceremonies, hundreds of perpetrators came forward at bonfires in front of their communities to confess to their victims, to ask for forgiveness – and to be forgiven. With the support of family, neighbors and elders, victims and perpetrators were embraced by the community, and cleansed as part of a traditional ceremony held the following day. From 2008-2014 Fambul Tok worked with 250+ sections, and 4000+ villages across the country.
In the tradition of truth telling around a bonfire, communities hosted bonfires, where victims and perpetrators came forward for the first time to tell their stories, apologize, and ask for, or offer, forgiveness. The communities then sang and danced of this open acknowledgement of and resolution to what happened during the war. The next day, cleansing ceremonies are held drawing on traditional cleansing practices, and traditions of communicating with the ancestors and pouring libations.
In 2011 a feature documentary called Fambul Tok was released, along with a companion book. Fambul Tok which means "family talk" in Krio documented the truth-telling and local reconciliation processes. The film premiered at SXSW film festival, was broadcast on EPIX cable channel and Netflix, and won numerous awards. (see www.fambultok.com)
In 2014-2015 the Ebola crisis occurred. Fambul Tok adapted to Ebola prevention and recovery. The Ebola crisis exposed the urgent need for healthy partnerships and participatory processes, as the lack of trust of outsiders at the local level severely hampered containment and prevention. Where effective relationships and community initiative and organization emerged, Ebola was managed successfully. Fambul Tok's Bridging Communities Network connected national response to hurting communities.
The post-Ebola recovery presented a significant opportunity to build a whole systems approach grounded in healthy relationships, which includes funders, government, organizations and communities. Healthy relationships require working towards a common purpose and a shift in the way the different stakeholders see each other, treat each other, and view their respective roles. Communities need to be at the center of the system with government and organizations supporting their leadership.
Instead of short-term aid with an outside-in trajectory, which often functions like pouring water into a broken cup, Fambul Tok’s approach focuses on repairing the cup – the community – so that it can not only better receive and utilize aid, but also tap into the reserves of groundwater (resources and untapped potential) already in the community, made manifest when the community comes together.
By adopting the approach for "repairing the cup" nationally, the Wan Fambul Framework structures a way to shift the role of outside aid from ‘fixing’ and ‘saving’ to one of creating the space for local leadership and accompanying it in fulfilling its potential.
Seeing the outside-in approach repeating itself in the national Ebola response, Fambul Tok and Catalyst for Peace initiated a national Healthy Partnerships Dialogue in 2015. That lead to beginning to pilot the People's Planning Process (PPP) in the districts of Kailahun, Koinadugu, and Moyamba, followed by holding Inclusive District Stakeholders Meetings (like the one pictured here in Moyamba District) that led to the formation of the IDCs.
In late 2015 and early 2016 there were IDC Formation meetings in Kailahun (pictured here), Koinadugu, Moyamba Districts. Fambul Tok continued rolling out the People Planning Process in new Chiefdoms and worked to help the IDCs develop and strengthen.
October 2016 - An Inter-District learning/sharing conference was held in Tiama, Moyamba. The Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD) committed to taking process national. That was the genesis of the idea of a national framework.
National Roundtable in Freetown, where the Ministry announced the national framework development process.
March and April 2017 - core partners in the framework development process were hosted in Northern Ireland for a planning meeting. Present were key representatives from the MLGRD (the Minister and the Director of the Decentralization Secretariat), Fambul Tok, and Catalyst for Peace, as well as leaders from the Pilot districts, and select international experts.
July–September 2017. The MLGRD secured Executive approval for the Wan Fambul National Framework process and it held the first Wan Fambul Framework National Consultation with national stakeholders. Fambul Tok continued the roll out of PPP in new chiefdoms and facilitated the ongoing development of the IDCs in the pilot districts. Two IDCs signed landmark revenue sharing agreements between the District Councils and Paramount Chiefs (traditional leaders).
November 2017. The Wan Fambul National Framework was launched in Freetown by the MLGRD, establishing the new Wan Fambul Secretariat (housed at Fambul Tok), and the national Steering and Technical Committees. The Draft Framework, drawn from the learning from the 3 pilot districts as well as the national consultations, is published.
Putting the people most impacted by the crisis at the center of the recovery and long-term development effort – including bringing local communities fully into the planning and decision-making – and forging mutually supportive relationships between local community leaders and government and organizations at the district, national and international levels is the key to repairing the social and structural fabric that will turn the tide in self-sufficiency and homegrown innovation.
Inclusive structures: The Wan Fambul Secretariat is the working body that supports the design, development, implementation and monitoring of the WFF. The Secretariat will sit at Fambul Tok and will serve as the technical coordinating arm of the new collaborative partnership with the MLGRD, MOPED, and the Office of the Vice President, including housing the national Technical Committee.
Inclusive structures--National Level: As coordinated through the Secretariat, the WFF has established a policy level Steering Committee and an ongoing Technical Committee to plan, support and oversee the consultation, design and validation process, in a way that stays connected with the ongoing learning from the implementing districts. The committees bring together key stakeholders from national government, funders, civil society, community representatives, local government.
Inclusive Structures-District: The Inclusive District Committee (IDC) provides a viable platform for continued, collaborative engagement for district stakeholders/partners and community representatives in discussing their problems, plans and strategies for healing, recovery and development as well as their strategies for continued oversight of the PPP in the district. The IDC provides the bridge from communities to national development stakeholders including the national government.
Inclusive Structures-Chiefdom: Inclusive Chiefdom Committee (ICC) provides a viable platform for continued, collaborative engagement for chiefdom stakeholders/partners and community reps in discussing their community peace and development problems, plans and strategies for healing, recovery and development as well as their strategies for continued oversight of the PPP at the chiefdom level. It provides the bridge from communities to district development stakeholders via the IDC.
Inclusive Structures-Local: Community Welfare and Mediation Committee (CWMC) mediates disputes in the villages and organizes communities to continue the process of healing and recovery, to improve development practices, and to help coordinate community development initiatives. Local CWMC members sometimes bringing bigger challenges to sectional
rotational meetings (see below) for broader consideration and input. The CWMCs are established
at the sectional/ward levels to repair the cup.
Inclusive Structures-Local: The Peace Mothers provide village women the chance to come together to support each other and work together for the healing and development of their communities. The Peace Mothers also provide leadership development opportunities for women so they are able to participate in other community structures with increased strength and voice, which is critical for the process to be truly inclusive. The have become a powerful engine for development and social change.
Explain your project idea (2,000 characters)
In the past two years, the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD) of Sierra Leone formed a new partnership with Fambul Tok International (LNGO) and Catalyst for Peace (INGO) to develop the Wan Fambul: National Framework for Inclusive Governance and Local Development. The Framework is designed to bring devolution to the next level and development to the doorstep of the people.
The Wan Fambul Framework outlines a holistic, community-owned and led process leading to a National People’s Plan, and it is built on the learning from a 3 ½-year comprehensive pilot process in three districts, in Kailahun, Moyamba and Koinadugu. The pilot tested a People’s Planning Process to mobilize communities to lead in their own recovery and development, while also creating an inclusive infrastructure to sustain and support that process. It is anchored in the Districts by an Inclusive District Committee (IDC), coordinating all the District peace and development stakeholders, including the District Councils, Traditional Leaders, MDAs, NGOs/INGOs, CSOs, Women, Youth, Disabled, Inter-Religious, and Community Representatives.
Since 2007, Fambul Tok and Catalyst for Peace (CFP) forged an approach to healing, recovery and ongoing development that places people and communities in the very center and at the helm – first through post-war reconciliation, then adapting to Ebola recovery and culminating in the People’s Planning Process. The People’s Planning Process (PPP) is an inclusive community mobilization and engagement process for community welfare and development. The process has built structures that are helping resolve long standing conflict and engaging communities to champion their own recovery and development. Inclusive District governance structures (IDCs) are then built to support/sustain the process. This ‘inside-out’ approach repairs the torn fabric of community and builds social immunity for the next crisis, helping break an endless crisis/response cycle.
Who are the beneficiaries? (1,000 characters)
The beneficiaries of the Wan Fambul Framework are the citizens of Sierra Leone. The Wan Fambul Framework offers a vision of a whole, inter-connected Sierra Leone, undivided by region, ethnicity and partisan political affiliation. Research has demonstrated that strengthening social capital with particular reference to the proxies of trust, collective action, inclusion, local groups and networks, and information and communication as embodied in the principles of the planning methods below, is relevant for peace and development operations in rural community levels. By offering “a new way of doing business” the WFF demonstrates Sierra Leoneans can live as “Wan Fambul” and value the gifts diversity brings.
Institutions and structures and people are part of the Wan Fambul Framework, including: District Councils, Traditional Leaders, MDAs, NGOs/INGOs, CSOs, Women, Youth, Disabled, Inter-Religious, and Community Representatives.
Cross Section of Paramount Chiefs Moyamba District, with other development stakeholders at the IDC formation meeting.
Group work discussion IDC members Moyamba District.
A traditional cultural dance in Ghapi-Songo organized by the Peace Mothers.
Sectional consultation in Konio Section Kissy Teng Chiefdom, Kailahun District.
Peace Mothers celebrate in Tangula, Moyamba District.
Community members participating in the IDC formation, Kailahun District.
Paramount Chiefs and District Council of Kailahun sign landmark agreement for joint revenue collection.
Then Minister of Local Government and Rural Development at the Inter-District Learning Conference in November 2016.
CWMC community representatives after the training in Bambuibu-Tommy-Section, Moyamba District.
Peace Mothers plan community development, Gbondo village, Kailahun District.
Validation of the PPP-and ICC Formation, Upper Banbara Section, Kailahun, District.
Paramount Chief H. H. Baion and Chairman Alex Bhonapha embraced after signing their revenue sharing agreement.
Sitting in the front row a cross section of paramount chief of Kailahun District in a revenue mobilization meeting in Daru.
Inclusive Chiefdom Committee (ICC) Executive, Upper Bambara.
How is your idea unique? (1,000 characters)
Genuine ownership is fostered. Fambul Tok has a three-layer approach to development: 1. The PPP mobilizes every village to define their own development needs and priorities, while also establishing gender-positive local inclusive governance structures that put implementation of local solutions squarely in the hands of local populations. Village representatives work together with their neighboring villages to address priority needs, even before outside aid is available, creating networks of empowered local leaders, with specific emphasis on women, and unleashing powerful local energy and resources for development. 2. The IDC fosters cross-sector coordination, addresses District conflicts and challenges, and allows District leadership in the ongoing rollout of the PPP. It fills the communications gaps to enable responsive service delivery to the people; 3. Development of a national policy framework to support grass-root development efforts.
Idea Proposal Stage (choose one)
Full Scale Roll Out: I have already tested and scaled this idea significantly with the intended user base.
Tell us more about your organization/company (1 sentence and website URL)
Fambul Tok is the inspiration and creation of the people of Sierra Leone, drawing on Sierra Leone’s “family talk” tradition of discussing and resolving issues within the security of a family circle. As a result, our approach is rooted not in western concepts of crime and punishment but in communal African sensibilities that emphasize the need for communities to be whole – with each and every member playing a role. http://www.fambultok.org https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=fambul%20tok%20int
A SL NGO, Fambul Tok is rooted in consultative processes that foster local ownership of the program at every level in order to create maximum impact in the community healing process in Sierra Leone. Fambul Tok is guided by the conviction that each person has the power, goodness and capacity to contribute to society in helpful and healthy ways. Yet when people experience violence and hurt, those innate capacities can be suppressed and cause individuals to act in ways contrary to their nature.
CFP has been a primary funder/program partner for Fambul Tok from the beginning. We believe the resources and wisdom of the ordinary people and places most impacted by wars and conflict are ignored or undervalued in conventional international approaches to post-war justice, development, and peacebuilding. In this ‘outside-in’ approach, problem-solving resources and capacities are brought or imposed from the outside. We know there is a harder, better way to build peace: from the inside-out.
Organization Filing Status
Yes, we are a registered non-profit.
In 3-4 sentences, tell us the inspiration or story that encouraged you to start this project.
“We are saying deal with Ebola in a way that structures will be in place to handle post-Ebola discussions, because experience or history has taught us that Ebola – there’s always a possibility that it will come again. So how do we put in place structures in the communities, in the districts, in the villages, to ensure that once Ebola comes again, we’ll have structures in place to deal with that immediately and it [won’t] get to where we are now.” — John Caulker, Executive Director of Fambul Tok
Please explain how your selected topic areas are influenced, in the local context of your project (1,000 characters).
Peace, prosperity and planet are integrity connected in Sierra Leone. In Sierra Leone when community mobilizers ask, “What kinds of problems contribute to the brokenness in our communities?” The answers one hears from both the community as well as the institutions related to the dire poverty found in rural and urban areas, to communal and personal conflict at all levels of a broken society, and to the changing climate which cases mudslides like the one in September 2017 outside of Freetown where 1,200 people were killed one morning at 6 am.
The People’s Planning Process acknowledges that the cup needs to be repaired—the community needs to be made whole—before any more water can be poured in, and it focuses resources and programming first in ways that repair the cup. Supporting communities to lead a process of community healing, and bringing communities together to create and own their own development agenda, repair the cracks in the cup.
Who will work alongside your organization in the project idea? (1,000 characters)
The Wan Fambul Framework is designed to support the MLGRD and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MOPED) in facilitating the process for the next 5 years in order to develop a National People’s Plan that is owned by the people from the sections, chiefdoms and districts up to the national level.
Please share some of the top strengths identified in the community which your project will serve (500 characters)
Like Fambul Tok, the Wan Fambul Framework originated in the realization peace can’t be imposed from the outside, or from the top down. Nor does it need to be. The community led, and owned reconciliation process Fambul Tok supports, witnesses and celebrates in Sierra Leone illustrates communities have within them the resources they need for their own healing.
How many months are required for the project idea? (500 characters)
Did you submit this idea to our 2017 BridgeBuilder Challenge? (Y/N)